In my conversations with various brands, I’ve noticed a very common pattern:
Many companies haven’t truly figured out “where to start” before entering overseas markets.
As a result, their approach often goes like this:
First, choose a platform
Then, find influencers
Finally, run ads
Each step seems reasonable on its own, but the result is that despite all the effort, growth remains inconsistent.
I. The Path Problem: Starting with “Execution” Instead of “Structure”
When expanding overseas, most brands prioritize:
Which platform to use
What ad formats to run
Which influencers to collaborate with
But these are essentially: execution-level issues
What truly determines success or failure, however, are structural-level issues
These include:
Brand positioning
Target audience
Market strategy
Content execution
If these aren’t established first, all subsequent actions will devolve into constant trial and error rather than purposeful growth.
II. Common Pitfall: Treating “Platforms” as the “Starting Point”
Many brands default to the logic of: launching on TikTok / Amazon / Xiaohongshu first
But in reality: platforms are merely amplifiers, not starting points.
Without a clear brand structure, platforms will only amplify problems:
Unstable conversion rates
Inability to retain users
Difficulty in establishing repeat purchases
III. Why This Issue Is More Pronounced in Developed Markets
In markets like Southeast Asia, channels and traffic can still drive short-term growth.
But in developed markets such as the U.S. and Japan:
User decision-making is more rational
Information is more transparent
Brand perception is more important
This means: Brands without a solid structure will struggle to gain sustained acceptance.
IV. Another Key Issue: Lack of an “Entry Strategy”
When expanding overseas, many brands lack a clear answer to the question: Where should we enter this market?
For example:
Which demographic to target first
What content to use to build awareness
How to acquire the first wave of users
Without a strategic roadmap, the result is often a scattered approach with no clear focus
V. Consequences of Structural Deficiencies
When a brand starts down the wrong path, the following typically occurs:
Advertising costs keep rising
Content effectiveness declines
Lack of synergy between channels
Unsustainable growth
Yet teams often misinterpret this as: “The market is just tough.”
VI. What Should Be the Correct Starting Point?
From a structural perspective, before entering overseas markets, brands should first accomplish three things:
Define the brand structure
Who are you? What problem do you solve? Why should consumers choose you?
Define the Target Audience
Not “everyone,” but who are the first users?
Design the Entry Strategy
Where to enter the market, and how to build brand awareness.
VII. Conclusion
The problem with many brands is not a lack of execution, but rather that they started from the wrong position from the very beginning.
Going global is not simply a matter of channel expansion; it is a complete process of reconstruction.
It requires brands to rebuild:
Awareness
Communication
Pathways
Only when these foundations are clear can stable growth occur.
Why Do So Many Brands Take the Wrong Path When Expanding Overseas?
0 則留言